Mentis8 / Engineering

Engineered as
one system.

Compute, GPU assemblies, power, cooling and os8. The engineering behind a custom enterprise harness on infrastructure you own.

Private enterprise intelligenceExplore ↓

Engineering the whole system

Six problems.
One operating system.

The custom harness, owned compute and private data boundary depend on physical engineering as much as software. Here are the decisions behind the design—and how each must be demonstrated.

01 / Compute
MEMORY IS A SHARED BUDGETModel weightsContext+ cacheCONCURRENT AGENT WORKAgent 1Agent 2Agent 3Agent 4Capacity and concurrency must be measured.
Conceptual design illustration

Fitting a model is only the beginning.

A model can fit in memory and still miss the response times a team needs. Concurrent agents add context, working memory and contention.

Size model-serving pools around memory residency, runtime compatibility and real workflows. Coordinate coding and reasoning services without treating the inter-node network as a substitute for the GPU fabric.

What proves the design

Measure useful throughput, latency and concurrency with the selected models, context lengths and runtime.

02 / GPU racks & assembly
ASSEMBLY + SERVICE ACCESSSupported modules. Accessible replacements.Rails
Conceptual design illustration

High-density compute. Serviceable parts.

Large GPU systems bring weight, airflow, cabling and access constraints. A rack that cannot be delivered or maintained is an unfinished design.

Retain supported server assemblies. Plan rails, load paths, cabinet containment, cable schedules and access for module replacement. Deliver and assemble around the actual building route.

What proves the design

Confirm OEM compatibility, rack loads, dimensions, delivery clearances and maintenance procedures.

03 / Power
TOTAL INPUT, SEPARATE BRANCHESQualified site supplyMeter + protectionComputeCoolingControlsCooling power belongs in the same budget.
Conceptual design illustration

One system. An engineered electrical boundary.

Compute and cooling draw power together. Connector size alone says nothing about building capacity, starting current or protective coordination.

Meter total system input and define regional power-entry and distribution assemblies with separate protected branches. Include cooling and auxiliaries in the electrical budget.

What proves the design

A qualified electrical designer releases the circuit and protection schedule from selected equipment data and the actual site.

04 / Thermal engineering
INDEPENDENT HEAT-REJECTION PATHSINSIDEOUTSIDEThermal 1Cooler 1→←Thermal 2Cooler 2→←Thermal 3Cooler 3→←One coolant pair per circuit.
Conceptual design illustration

Move the heat out. Keep the work inside.

Office air conditioning is not an assumed heat sink. Hot-weather duty, hose losses and a failed cooling module all change the operating envelope.

Contain server airflow and use three independently pumped cooling circuits with indoor sealed refrigeration and outdoor fluid coolers. Design for service access and controlled response to cooling loss.

What proves the design

Validate selected OEM duty curves, pressure losses, residual room heat and physical load-bank fault tests.

Follow the thermal path ↗
05 / os8 & the custom harness
WHERE PEOPLE MEET THEIR AGENTSSlackEmailDurable agents · ∞Custom harness + os8On dedicated enterprise infrastructure.
Conceptual design illustration

Turn local models into enterprise work.

A capable model does not know your permissions, procedures or definition of a completed task. Those must be designed into the system around it.

os8 grounds durable agents in the user, environment and applicable constraints. Agents act, verify progress, retain useful experience and evaluate improvements locally. The custom harness connects this runtime to the firm, including Slack and email.

What proves the design

Qualify each workflow against agreed outputs, access boundaries, recovery behavior and inspectable records.

06 / System integration
ACCEPT THE COMPLETE SYSTEM1Factory configuration2Site + utilities3Representative workloadsTest records → handover → operation
Conceptual design illustration

The interfaces are part of the product.

Individually capable components do not automatically make a dependable enterprise system. Power, cooling, software and the site interact.

Define shared operating limits and independent protective functions. Factory-test the configuration, commission it onsite and hand over named service responsibilities.

What proves the design

Demonstrate the complete system under representative workloads and faults before accepting the deployment.

Reference architecture under qualification. Design decisions and simulation results are not a claim that every subsystem has completed physical validation.

From engineering to installation ↗
Go deeperRead the details & qualification notes

Separate the workloads. Coordinate the work.

Enterprise boundary

Approved systems & identity

Sources · permissions · systems of record

Operating layer

os8

Context · plans · agents · review · records

Coding service

Qualified local model-serving pool

Reasoning service

Qualified local model-serving pool

Conceptual service topology. Model choice and physical allocation depend on workload qualification.

Services exchange scoped requests and artifacts. That connection is distinct from the high-bandwidth GPU interconnect used within a model-serving node.

Make dependencies visible.

BoundaryReview focus
Enterprise ingressAuthentication, source access and permission mapping.
Model servicesModel/runtime compatibility, concurrency, context length and isolation.
Action executionScoped credentials, approval requirements and result recording.
ManagementAdministrative access, update path and recovery responsibilities.
Physical infrastructurePower, heat rejection, monitoring and independent protective functions.

A specification is a starting point.

01

Published

Component documentation describes candidate capabilities.

02

Modeled

Calculations and simulations explore an assumed operating envelope.

03

Measured

Configuration-specific tests establish actual system behavior.

The reference design remains under qualification. No measured production service level is asserted here. A technical review should establish the configuration, assumptions and tests needed for the intended workload.

Continue exploring

Security & control

Security & control

Mentis8 / Private briefing

Begin with
your enterprise.

A briefing starts with your workloads, operating requirements and deployment environment.

Pilot-ready. Contact alex@fireboard.ai to discuss your workload and site requirements.